Emerging market equities had a dream run since the bottom in 2016 (where, if you recall, they took a pummeling as a number of EM economies went into recession, China slowed, currencies crunched, and commodities crashed). But if you look at the long term cycles of EM vs US relative performance, it appears that EM equities may only just be getting started.
Get The REITs eBook in PDF
Get our PDF study on REITs and our other investor studies! Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.
Indeed, as I highlight below, EM equities appear to go through 7-9 year cycles of outperformance, and 5-6 year cycles of underperformance. Looking at the charts it appears as though a new cycle of outperformance may be getting underway, and if the historical experience of this phase taking 7-9 years to play out continues, this could be a really key theme for investors to be across.
Bringing in some other data points, the EM equity earnings/macro pulse has been on the positive side for the past year, and cuts in monetary policy rates at an aggregate level across emerging market economies also reinforces the case for EM equities. Finally, the relative value picture also lines up with the observations around long-term cycles of under/out performance. Thus it presents an interesting short term and longer dynamic for the outlook.
The key takeaways on EM equities and outlook for relative performance against the S&P500 are:
-EM equities appear to go through long-term cycles of under/out performance vs US equities.
-The chart suggests that a new cycle of outperformance may be underway, and the earnings/macro/policy/valuation picture seems to support this assertion.
-Cycles of EM outperformance seem to take 7-9 years to fully play out, so this could be a key long term theme for investors.
- Emerging Markets vs the S&P500: EM equities appear to undergo long term cycles of under/out performance against US equities. The first two up cycles in the chart below took 7 and 9 years respectively to complete, and the down cycles took 6 and 5 years respectively to complete. So we can deduce that down cycles are more rapid and up cycles are more prolonged. This is important context given we now appear to be in a new up cycle.
Looking for more ideas? Why not take a free trial for an extra level of insight and service…
Original Source: http://Valuewalk.com