While it has yet to be seen if the SEC will crack down on Elon Musk, and whether the Tesla CEO can round up enough investors (which he allegedly already has a commitment letter from over a week ago) to participating in his going private transaction, remains to be seen but even in an ideal scenario where everything goes according to Elon’s plan, he may be facing a major hurdle once he begins executing his quasi public/private transformation, which keeps large investors but removes day to day gyrations in the stock (and only offers two “liquidity” events per year): most passive funds would have to drop Tesla if it were removed from stock indexes.
Meanwhile, according to Reuters, actively-managed funds might need complicated approvals to hold a stake in the mutated company.
“Our inclination is that if we could go private with him, we would, but it’s complicated,” a large Tesla investor told Reuters. “We would have to call clients and ask for approval, but it’s complicated. And I think it’s complicated for many funds.”
The reason: private shares are illiquid, and usually very hard to price, raising concerns of whether they are appropriate for public portfolios.
As a reminder, Musk’s grand scheme is to convert Tesla into a quasi-private company, whose shareholders are almost exclusively large funds even as smaller investors generally cash out. But his plan would be hindered by the very nature of the structure he hopes to lure his “whale” investors in to, making it prohibitively difficult to find enough equity investors in the transaction.
The uncertainty over how many investors could hold private shares, and would want to, would be a challenge for Musk because the final tally would dictate how much capital he would need to raise to buy out those who would sell the stock.
On Monday, Musk blogged he was reaching out to top investors to see “whether they had the ability and desire to remain shareholders in a private Tesla.” He may be disappointed very soon:
One pool that would likely not be Musk’s allies in the effort are big passive vehicles like the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund. The holdings of the fund, which holds 2% of Tesla’s shares, are based on an index tracking shares on the NYSE and Nasdaq, according to its prospectus. Naturally, that would be impossible with a private company.
Vanguard spokeswoman Carolyn Wegemann said “as private companies are not included in indexes, any shares held in an index fund when a company goes private would likely be sold/tendered.” Other ETF providers will face the same restriction, and the more that are forced to sell their shares, the greater the debt check will have to be.
One potential silver lining is that more of Musk’s top fund investors are active stockpickers. According to researcher Morningstar, 19 percent of Tesla’s fund ownership rests in passive portfolios, compared with 28 percent at General Motors and 56 percent at Ford Motor.
And, at least on paper, active funds would generally have more leeway to continue to own Tesla after a go-private transaction.
Here Reuters notes that Tesla’s largest active fund investors include some that have held private companies such as Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund.
At June 29 it held securities of private companies like Uber Technologies Inc and Lyft Inc according to a disclosure. A Fidelity spokeswoman declined to comment
For index funds, however, the endgame is clear:
David Barclay, chief operating officer of the Center for Research in Security Prices at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, said he knew of no case of a security remaining in an index fund after it went private.
All of this, of course, assumes that the SEC won’t crack down on Musk before he ever gets the deal off the ground, or that Musk can find enough willing investors. Both are big “ifs”.
Read on ZH