Get Our Activist Investing Case Study!
Get the entire 10-part series on our in-depth study on activist investing in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or print it out to read anywhere! Sign up below!
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has acted within its statutory authority in adopting an amendment to the terms of conservatorship of the GSEs in 2012 that implemented the infamous Net Worth Sweep. The Obama-era policy pivot requires the perpetual diversion of the GSEs’ quarterly earnings to the U.S. Treasury.
The Sweep was conceived and implemented in deceit. It was touted as a way to shield taxpayers from having to cough up more bailout money for Fannie and Freddie. But as federal courts demanded the government turn over documents related to the deliberations and rationale for the Sweep, it has become obvious that the GSEs were actually relatively healthy and the Sweep was merely a means of crippling the unpopular housing finance entities by siphoning off their profits for whatever the Administration needed money for.
For years the shareholders whose property was unconstitutionally taken from this policy have doggedly pursued justice and restoration of the rule of law. Over the last five years, there have been come victories, especially with regard to forcing the government to hand over once “privileged” documents. But once again a federal court sided with the government in its extraordinary overreach of statutory authority.
However, while Tuesday’s dismissal of shareholder claims in Texas court’s Collins vs. FHFA is no doubt disheartening for shareholders waiting for wrongs to be made right, faith remains that the rule of law will be upheld. In a , Judge Don Willett argues against the court’s finding that FHFA has acted within its statutory authority by adopting the Net Worth Sweep, and explains:
Ten years after the financial crisis, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have paid back emergency taxpayer-backed loans plus an additional $91 billion. The rule of law is fragile and needs constant reinforcement. Now it’s time for the government – and other courts looking at additional shareholder suits – to reread Judge Willet’s dissent.
Read on Valuewalk